Chelation therapy has always been a contentious topic, and now there is a new issue to contend with. Oral chelation therapy has elevated the chelation therapy technique by substituting a tablet form of EDTA for the injected EDTA.
Some of the same folks who are against chelation therapy are against oral chelation therapy as well. The difference is that some traditional chelation therapy proponents are skeptical about the oral chelation therapy concept. You can also get the best medicien therapy in Spokane.
Image Source: Google
Actually, some of the same people believe that oral chelation therapy is hazardous to the human body. We'll go over the essentials of their argument so you can use it as a starting point for your own research.
According to scientists, the human body absorbs only 5% of the EDTA taken orally, leaving 95% of the EDTA in the body. A large amount of EDTA taken during oral chelation therapy might stick around and interact with undigested food, allowing minerals like copper, zinc, and chromium to be absorbed.
The more EDTA is absorbed, the less EDTA is available for the body to absorb. A shortage of these nutrients can cause a deficiency in the body, which can lead to subsequent complications. Despite the fact that this is a solid case against oral chelation therapy, many consumers and doctors believe in it.
Another argument against oral chelation therapy, but one in favor of traditional chelation therapy, is the amount of time EDTA spends in the body. When someone undergoes oral chelation therapy, they consume EDTA on a daily basis for a period of time.